MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2690195421

Effects of inorganic and organic amendments on soil phosphorus chemistry in calcareous soils

2015· dissertation· en· W2690195421 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuki Audette

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalcareousPhosphorusEnvironmental chemistryCalcareous soilsSoil waterChemistryEnvironmental scienceAgronomySoil scienceBotanyOrganic chemistryBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organic amendments provide both plant-available nutrients and organic matter to soils, resulting in improvements to soil chemical, physical and biological quality as well as fertility. These amendments can directly affect the chemistry of soil phosphorus (P) by altering the amounts, distribution and transformations of various soil P fractions. The overall goal of this thesis is to understand the effects of inorganic and organic amendments on soil P chemistry in calcareous soils for establishing more effective P fertility management. Transformations of various P forms in the soils amended with either animal manure compost or inorganic P fertilizer and with or without plant growth were studied. The dynamics of P in calcareous soils and analytical techniques for quantifying and characterizing forms of inorganic and organic P in either calcareous soils or in animal manure composts were also studied to assist in designing appropriate experiments to evaluate plant P availability. \tThe highlights of this thesis were (1) forms of P in animal manure composts were clearly different from those in inorganic P fertilizers, and mainly associated with calcium and magnesium, which were extractable with weak acids, (2) turkey litter compost increased weak acid-soluble inorganic P in soils, which transformed into plant available P with plant growth, (3) ryegrass took up P from the inorganic P extractable with a weak base extractant (NaHCO3) in all soils and from the inorganic P extractable with a weak acid extractant (NH4Ac) in the soils rich in P, (4) ryegrass promoted mineralization of organic P in the soils relatively deficient in P, and (5) the plant availability of P in turkey litter compost could be equivalent or greater from that in synthetic inorganic P fertilizers in the long term. \tThe current soil P fertility management system in Ontario only considers NaHCO3 extractable inorganic P (Olsen P) as an indicator of plant available P. This may result in significant underestimation of the plant available P in soils where organic amendments, such as animal manures and composts, as they affect soil P chemistry differently from that of inorganic P fertilizers. This research has shown that weak acid extractable P should be considered as an alternative indicator of soil P fertility, especially in soils receiving organic amendments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→French-language works237,207→