Indirect Outreach in a GIS Environment: Reflections on a Map Libraryâs Approach to Promoting GIS Services to Non-GIS Users
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Promoting non-traditional library resources to the academic community can be a challenging and sometimes ineffective process if not coordinated and planned thoroughly. The University of Waterloo Map Library (UML), specializing in cartographic and geospatial data resources, diligently visits dozens of classrooms yearly, promoting its resources and services. The nature of the content is often intimidating to the students however, because Geographical Information System (GIS) technology is unfamiliar to them. In September 2007, the Map Library instigated a new indirect outreach approach of connecting with students and introducing them to geospatial information literacy concepts. Instead of leaving students confused about the technology and the libraryâs vast amount of resources, the new approach encourages students to learn at their own pace and leaves them responsible for seeking more information when they need it. This approach has resulted in establishing relationships with many more students, and thus increasing the number of GIS users in the library and on campus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it