MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2693946381 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1500050

Petersite-(Ce), Cu<sup>2+</sup><sub>6</sub>Ce(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(OH)<sub>6</sub>·3H<sub>2</sub>O, A New Mixite Group Mineral From Yavapai County, Arizona, USA

2016· article· en· W2693946381 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMohs scale of mineral hardnessCrystallographyOrthoclaseElectron microprobeMineralAcicularAlbiteAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryMineralogyQuartzMaterials scienceBiotiteMetallurgyMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new mineral, petersite-(Ce), ideally Cu 2+ 6 Ce(PO 4 ) 3 (OH) 6 ·3H 2 O (IMA2014-002), has been found in the Cherry Creek District of Yavapai County, Arizona, USA. It is a secondary alteration mineral associated with malachite, chlorite, a biotite phase, quartz, albite, orthoclase, hematite, chalcopyrite, and an uncharacterized hisingerite-like mineral. Petersite-(Ce) occurs as sprays of yellowish-green, acicular crystals approximately 20 × 20 × 50 μm in size. It has a white streak with vitreous luster. The mineral is brittle and has a Mohs hardness of ∼3.5; no cleavage or parting was observed. The calculated density is 3.424 g/cm 3 . An electron microprobe analysis resulted in an empirical chemical formula of Cu 6.05 (Ce 0.18 Y 0.16 La 0.12 Nd 0.09 Gd 0.03 Pr 0.02 Dy 0.01 Sm 0.01 Ca 0.42 ) Σ1.04 [(PO 4 ) 2.54 (SiO 4 ) 0.14 (PO 3 OH) 0.32 (OH) 6 ]·3.65H 2 O. Petersite-(Ce) is hexagonal, with space group P 6 3 / m and unit-cell parameters a 13.2197(18) A, c 5.8591(9) A, and V 886.8(4) A 3 , Z = 2. It is the Ce analogue of petersite-(Y) and exhibits the mixite structure type. The mixite group can be expressed by the general formula Cu 2+ 6 A ( T O 4 ) 3 (OH) 6 · 3H 2 O, where nine-coordinated A is a rare earth element, Al, Ca, Pb, or Bi, and T is P or As. The structure of petersite-(Ce) is characterized by chains of edge-sharing CuO 5 square-pyramids along c . These chains are connected in the a-b plane by edge-sharing CeO 9 polyhedra and corner-sharing PO 4 tetrahedra. Hydroxyl groups occupy each corner of the CuO 5 polyhedra not shared by a neighboring P or Ce atom. Each CeO 9 polyhedron is surrounded by three zeolitic channels. The walls of the channels, parallel to c , are six-membered, hexagonal rings composed of CuO 5 and PO 4 polyhedra in a ratio of 2:1, respectively, and contain H 2 O molecules. In our model of petersite-(Ce), we defined one distinct H 2 O site positioned to form a ring inside the channel, although there are many statistically possible locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it