Bibliographic record
Abstract
Family has been defined as a social unit related by blood, marriage, and adoption. A network of political, social and economic relationship exists among family members, as well as between family members and the society they live in, and this network has influenced the change in family structure. This paper examines the influence of demographic and socio-economic factors on the changing family structures in Botswana comparatively to other Southern African countries. Data from Population Censuses, Demographic Health Surveys and other related literature are used to examine the influence of: fertility, marriage, education, migration, inheritance patterns, and HIV/AIDS on the family structure. It notes that there is a decline in fertility and marriage patterns in Botswana and other Southern African countries under a review which changes the structure of the family from the traditional (extended family) to the modem (nuclear and single-parent families). The paper argues that the weakening of family structure is also because of inheritance disputes which are influenced by inheritance customary laws that look down upon women empowerment. Furthermore, HIV/AIDS related mortality and morbidity has also wrecked a lot of families. There are many orphans in Southern Africa due to HIV/AIDS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".