MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2695048687

Geometric Design of Turbo Roundabouts According to Croatian and Dutch Guidelines

2016· article· en· W2695048687 on OpenAlexaff
Tamara Džambas, Saša Ahac, Vesna Dragčević

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure CETRA · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoundaboutTurboTransport engineeringGeometric designComputer scienceEngineeringAutomotive engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Turbo roundabout is a specific kind of multilane roundabout with spiral circulatory roadway and physical separation of traffic lanes. This particular roundabout layout was developed in the Netherlands in the late nineties of the last century with the aim of solving capacity and safety problems that occur in standard multilane roundabouts. In this paper geometric design of turbo roundabouts is analysed. Comparative analysis of turbo roundabout design procedures described in the latest Croatian and source Dutch guidelines is made, modifications of Croatian turbo roundabout in regard to Dutch layout are presented, and advantages and disadvantages of both design procedures are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure CETRASame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207