MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2695095978 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2017.7946693

Fast estimation of tridiagonal matrices largest eigenvalue

2017· article· en· W2695095978 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTridiagonal matrixTridiagonal matrix algorithmEigenvalues and eigenvectorsSpeedupMatrix (chemical analysis)ComputationAlgorithmMATLABApplied mathematicsComputer scienceSparse matrixMathematicsMathematical optimizationParallel computingPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a method for speeding up the estimation of the absolute value of largest eigenvalue of an asymmetric tridiagonal matrix based on Power method. An error analysis shows that the proposed method provide errors no greater than the usual Power method. The proposed method involves the computation of the tridiagonal matrix square under analysis, which is performed through a proposed fast algorithm specially tailored for tridiagonal matrices. We perform numerical simulations on Matlab® platform showing the reliability of the method and the claimed speedup using Sylvester-Kac test matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207