MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2697079666 · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.20083.53285

Hormonal stimulation in Nelore calves for in vitro embryo production

2015· article· en· W2697079666 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. A. Zacarias, Ana Luíza Silva Guimarães, J. R. Scaliante, S. A. D. Rodrigues, Margot Alves Nunes Dode, Ricardo Alamino Figueiredo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstradiol benzoateBreedHormoneMedicineEmbryoEstrous cycleBiologyGynecologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyAnimal scienceOvariectomized rat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of reproductive management on prepubertal bovine females for including these animals in the IVF could be an alternative for accelerating genetic gain by reducing the generation interval. This work aimed to evaluate a hormonal treatment response on the ovarian characteristics and on the OPU (Laparoscope Storz Xenon300W. Tuttlingen, Germany)/IVF in 9 Nelore calves (cross-over design) 4-7 months old. In the control group (CG, n=9) transrectal ultrasonography (US) was performed daily (MyLab 30VetGold,Esaote, 5-7,5MHz transducer. Genova, Italy) during 8 days (D0 to OPU) and ablation of larger follicles was performed on D2 (5 days before OPU). In the treated group (TG, n=9) US was also performed during 8 days, which D0 represented the start of treatment (Intravaginal device. Progesterone-P4 0.33g. Eazi-Breed-CIDR, Pfizer Animal Health, Brazil) including an injection of estradiol benzoate (im. 2mg. Ric-BE, Tecnopec-Brazil). From the D4 on, 6 FSH injections were administered, during 3 days (im. 12/12h: 40mg+5 20mg doses. Total:140mg; Folltropin, Bioniche Animal Health, BellevilleOntario, Canada). On the last FSH dose, it was administered 2.5mg of LH (im. Lutropin, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville-Ontario, Canada). The OPU was performed 20-24h after the last FSH injection (D7). The P4 devices were removed right after the OPU. Aspirated COCs were selected, matured, fertilized and cultured in vitro until D7. As IVF control, COCs obtained from slaughterhouse ovaries were used (Slaughterhouse Group-SG). The US or OPU grouped data were simultaneously compared between CG vs TG on D0 and D7 and analyzed according to their distribution, by t and Man-Whitney tests. The IVF results were compared among CG, TG and SG by Chi-square test and Kruskal Wallis (PROPHET 5.0, BBN-Systems&Technologies, Cambridge-Massachusetts, USA). The TG had increased (p 0.05) the cleavage rate (49.33% vs 51.42%, respectively CG vs TG), the rate and the number of blastocysts in D7 (1.33% vs 8.57% or 3 vs 9, respectively for rate or number in CG vs TG. SG blastocysts rate: 24.41%) nor the number of embryos/female donor (0.33 vs 1.0, respectively CG vs TG). It was concluded that this hormonal treatment increased the number of observed and aspirated follicles, grade I and II oocytes, but it did not increase embryo production on these animals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→