Indigenous Storywork: Educating the Heart, Mind, Body, and Spirit
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indigenous Storywork: Educating the Heart, Mind, Body, and Spirit. By Jo-ann Archibald/ Q'um Q'um Xiiem. (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2008. Pp. xiv + 176, preface, acknowledgments, bibliography, index. $99.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.)In this insightful look into the of Coast Salish and Sto:loo elders, Jo-Ann Archibald combines traditional ways of looking at story with a scholarly approach documentation of her sources. She tells us she wanted to demonstrate that Indigenous knowledge systems could be investigated from an Indigenous perspective with rigour acceptable the academy (5).Archibald is Associate Dean for Indigenous Education in the Faculty of Education at die University of British Columbia. As a member of the Sto:lo (Coqualeetza) community and a worker in First Nation educational programs, she received trusted story knowledge from elders. Working from what must have been countless hours of interviews, she examines the uses of story in those communities. She coins the term storywork describe the way story is used reach the hearts of listeners. Storywork is required of both the teller and the listener in order make meaning happen. She quotes the elders, who say that listening requires three ears: two on the sides of our head and one that is in our heart (8).Archibald spends much time talking about her relationship the communities she studies, and she explains the extremely careful way in which stories were set down. During the collection of stories for a First Nations Journeys of Justice curriculum project, curriculum elders read over the transcripts of their stories and were able demand rewriting until they were satisfied that the words echoed their own. Each page had be signed by the teller as evidence that it had been approved. The rights the stories remained with the teller, except for the curriculum use.Archibald includes texts for two First Nations stories and summarizes two more, but this is not a tale collection. She is interested in how and why stories are told. She particularly examines the potential use of traditional story in the educauon of today's First Nations children.Mentors guided her work: Chief Khot-La-Cha, Dr. Simon Baker, Tsimilano, Dr. Vincent Stogan, Kwulasulwut, and Dr. Ellen White. Chapter 1 talks about the teachings she had from them. She references as well the thinking of many other First Nation scholars. Chapter 3 reveals the insights Archibald gained into from working with members of the Stori Nation, especially with the Coqualeetza Elders at Sardis, British Columbia. Learning listen with patience, Archibald spent much time with these elders, recording their wisdom on tape and in her journal. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it