MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W270421130 · doi:10.1137/15m101631x

Parametric Resonance in Spherical Immersed Elastic Shells

2016· article· en· W270421130 on OpenAlexaff
William L. Ko, John M. Stockie

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmersed boundary methodFluid–structure interactionInviscid flowPhysicsMechanicsSpherical shellParametric statisticsViscosityViscous liquidFloquet theoryClassical mechanicsBoundary value problemShell (structure)Boundary (topology)CompressibilityMathematical analysisMathematicsFinite element methodMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We perform a stability analysis for a fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problem in which a spherical elastic shell or membrane is immersed in a three-dimensional (3D) viscous, incompressible fluid. The shell is an idealized structure having zero thickness and has the same fluid lying both inside and outside. The problem is formulated mathematically using the immersed boundary framework, in which Dirac delta functions are employed to capture the two-way interaction between fluid and immersed structure. The elastic structure is driven parametrically via a time-periodic modulation of the elastic membrane stiffness. We perform a Floquet stability analysis in the case of both a viscous and inviscid fluid and demonstrate that the forced fluid-membrane system gives rise to parametric resonances in which the solution becomes unbounded even in the presence of viscosity. The analytical results are validated using numerical simulations with a 3D immersed boundary code for a range of wavenumbers and physical parameter values. Moreover, we propose a benchmark computation that is supported by our analytical results and which other FSI software developers can use to validate their simulations. Finally, potential applications to biological systems are discussed, with a particular focus on the human heart and investigating whether or not FSI-mediated instabilities could play a role in cardiac fluid dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Applied MathematicsSame topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207