Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book available since 2011 from Quintessence Publishing Company UK and entitled “Prosthetic Rehabilitation Part-II: Technical Procedures” is the English language translated version of the original Italian edition entitled “Riabilitazione Protesica”. The original title was published in 2004 by UTET – Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese S.P.A, Italy. The translation has been done by Jennifer Sardo Inferri and funded by Segretario Europeo Per Le Publicazioni Scientifiche (SEPS) Bologna, Italy. The book is authored by more than 30 senior teachers and specialist practitioners who are either graduates or affiliated to the University of Turin in Italy. The need for and the quality of the writing as well as the credentials of all the authors and its editor Giulio Preti, currently Professor Emeritus at the University of Turin, Italy, can be judged by reading the “Foreword” on page IX of the book that has been written by the “Father of Modern Era Prosthodontics- George A. Zarb” Professor Emeritus at the University of Toronto Canada. According to editor of the book, Professor Emeritus Giulio Preti, the writing has been based on the life-long clinical experiences and practices in the department at the dental school in Turin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".