In vitro and in vivo evidence of a potential A(H1N1)pdm09 antigenic drift mediated by escape mutations in the haemagglutinin Sa antigenic site
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus continues to circulate worldwide without evidence of significant antigenic drift between 2009 and 2016. By using escape mutants, we previously identified six haemagglutinin (HA) changes (T80R, G143E, G158E, N159D, K166E and A198E) that were located within antigenic sites. Combinations of these mutations were introduced into the A(H1N1)pdm09 HA plasmid by mutagenesis. Reassortant 6 : 2 viruses containing both the HA and NA genes of the A(H1N1)pdm09 and the six internal gene segments of A/PR/8/34 were rescued by reverse genetics. In vitro, HA inhibition and microneutralization assays showed that the HA hexa-mutant reassortant virus (RG1) escaped A(H1N1)pdm09 hyper-immune ferret antiserum recognition. C57Black/6 mice that received the vaccine formulated with A/California/07/09 were challenged with 2×104 p.f.u. of either the 6 : 2 wild-type (WT) or RG1 viruses. Reductions in body weight loss, mortality rate and lung viral titre were observed in immunized animals challenged with the 6 : 2 WT virus compared to non-immunized mice. However, immunization did not protect mice challenged with RG1 virus. To further characterize the mutations causing this antigenic change, 11 additional RG viruses whose HA gene contained single or combinations of mutations were evaluated in vitro. Although the RG1 virus was still the least reactive against hyper-immune serum by HAI testing, mutations G158E and N159D within the Sa antigenic site appeared to play the major role in the altered antigenicity of the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus. These results show that the Sa antigenic site contains the most prominent epitopes susceptible to cause an antigenic drift, escaping actual vaccine protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".