MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2706404031

The Quebec-Paris-Ottawa Relation and the Creation of the International Organization of La Francophonie (1960-2005)

2006· article· en· W2706404031 on OpenAlex
Stéphane Paquin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGuerres mondiales et conflits contemporains · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSummitFrenchGeographerFellPoliticsRelation (database)Political scienceInternational relationsEconomic historySociologyLawHistoryGeographyArchaeologyCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The French geographer Onesime Reclus invented the term « francophonie » in 1880, but it was only in 1986, a century later, that the first Francophone Summit was held. These gatherings of French-speaking countries had been desired since the 1960s by the President of Senegal, Leopold Sedar Senghor, by the President of Tunisia, Habib Bourguiba, and by the President of Niger, Hamani Diori. The founding of the Organisation internationale de la Francophonie fell victim during the Quiet Revolution to the strained political relations between the governments of Quebec and Ottawa. This article retraces the history of the Paris-Quebec-Ottawa triangular relationship from the establishment of the Agence de cooperation culturelle et technique to the Mulroney-Johnson agreement of 1985 which allowed Quebec during the Summits to become a decision-making party.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it