MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2707606089

Expression, pose, and illumination invariant face recognition using lower order pseudo Zernike moments

2015· article· en· W2707606089 on OpenAlexaff
Madeena Sultana, Marina L. Gavrilova, Svetlana Yanushkevich

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP), 2014 International Conference on · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZernike polynomialsArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Invariant (physics)Normalization (sociology)Facial expressionComputer visionFacial recognition systemComputer scienceGabor waveletWaveletExpression (computer science)Orientation (vector space)Face (sociological concept)MathematicsWavelet transformDiscrete wavelet transformGeometryOpticsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Face recognition is an extremely challenging task with the presence of expression, orientation, and lightning variation. This paper presents a novel expression and pose invariant feature descriptor by combining Daubechies discrete wavelets transform and lower order pseudo Zernike moments. A novel normalization method is also proposed to obtain illumination invariance. The proposed method can recognize face images regardless of facial orientation, expression, and illumination variation using small number of features. An extensive experimental investigation is conducted using a large variation of facial orientation, expression, and illumination to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Experimental results confirm that the proposed approach obtains high recognition accuracy and computational efficiency under different pose, expression, and illumination conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP), 2014 International Conference onSame topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207