MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2707790983 · doi:10.7202/1040040ar

Fonctionnement de l’enfant qui présente une déficience intellectuelle et pistes d’interventions

2016· article· fr· W2707790983 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Valérie Côté, Catherine Couture, Sarah Lippé

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de psychologie · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de la GaspésieUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les personnes qui présentent une déficience intellectuelle (DI) ont des atteintes du fonctionnement cognitif, langagier, psychologique et comportemental qui entravent leurs comportements adaptatifs. L’objectif de cet article est de décrire les différentes atteintes des personnes ayant une DI et de suggérer des pistes d’interventions pour chacun des types d’atteintes. Les connaissances actuelles sur l’efficacité de ces interventions chez les personnes qui présentent une DI seront décrites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de psychologieSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207