MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2707957266 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2017.7952984

Particle flow SMC delta-GLMB filter

2017· article· en· W2707957266 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDegeneracy (biology)Filter (signal processing)Particle filterParticle (ecology)Auxiliary particle filterFlow (mathematics)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceAlgorithmMechanicsTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsMathematicsEnsemble Kalman filterArtificial intelligenceKalman filterCombinatoricsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we derive a particle flow particle filter implementation of the δ-Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli (δ-GLMB) filter. The bootstrap particle filter δ-GLMB suffers from weight degeneracy for high-dimensional state systems or low measurement noise. In order to avoid weight degeneracy, we employ particle flow to produce a measurement-driven importance distribution that serves as a proposal in the δ-GLMB particle filter. Flow-induced proposals are developed for both types of targets encountered in the δ-GLMB filter, i.e., persistent and birth targets. Numerical simulations reflect the improved performance of the proposed filter with respect to classical bootstrap implementations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it