Une histoire culturelle du pouvoir en Allemagne (Moyen Âge, époque moderne) : autour de Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rapport établi par Guillaume Garner 1Le 12 février 2010 s'est tenue à l'ENS Lyon une journée d'études conjointement organisée par l'IFHA, l'ENS Lyon et le SFB 596 de l'Université de Münster sur les renouvellements de l'histoire politique de l'Allemagne au Moyen Âge et à l'époque moderne.L'occasion en était la parution de deux ouvrages rédigés par Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger sur ce thème 1 , et dont l'importance a été reconnue en Allemagne : une synthèse sur l'histoire du Saint-Empire de 1495 à 1806, et le catalogue d'une exposition consacrée aux rituels politiques de 800 à 1800.Le principe de cette manifestation consistait à présenter les positions de B. STOLLBERG-RILINGER, celles-ci étant ensuite commentées et discutées par deux historiens français.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".