Clino-suenoite, a newly approved magnesium-iron-manganese amphibole from Valmalenco, Sondrio, Italy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Clino-suenoite, ideally □ ${\rm Mn}_{2}^{2 +} $ Mg 5 Si 8 O 22 (OH) 2 is a new amphibole of the magnesium-iron-manganese subgroup of the amphibole supergroup. The type specimen was found at the Lower Scerscen Glacier, Valmalenco, Sondrio, Italy, where it occurs in Mn-rich quartzite erratics containing braunite, rhodonite, spessartine, carbonates and various accessory minerals. The empirical formula derived from electron microprobe analysis and single-crystal structure refinement is: A Na 0.04 B ( ${\rm Mn}_{1.58}^{2 +} $ Ca 0.26 Na 0.16 ) Σ2.00 C (Mg 4.21 ${\rm Mn}_{0. 61}^{2 +} {\rm Fe}_{0.04}^{2 +} $ Zn 0.01 Ni 0.01 ${\rm Fe}_{0.08}^{3 +} $ Al 0.04 ) Σ5.00 T Si 8.00 O 22 W [(OH 1.94 F 0.06 )] Σ=2.00. Clino-suenoite is biaxial (+), with α = 1.632(2), β = 1.644(2), γ = 1.664(2) and 2V meas. = 78(2)° and 2V calc. = 76.3°. The unit-cell parameters in the C2 / m space group are a = 9.6128(11), b = 18.073(2), c = 5.3073(6) Å, β = 102.825(2)° and V = 899.1(2) Å 3 with Z = 2. The strongest ten reflections in the powder X-ray diffraction pattern [ d (in Å), I , ( hkl )] are: 2.728, 100, (151); 2.513, 77, ( $\bar 2$ 02); 3.079, 62, (310); 8.321, 60, (110); 3.421, 54, (131); 2.603, 42, (061); 2.175, 42, (261); 3.253, 41, (240); 2.969, 40, (221); 9.036, 40, (020).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it