MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2712072927 · doi:10.1056/jp200806230000004

Rapid Serious Adverse Events with Antipsychotics in Dementia

2008· article· en· W2712072927 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Roy‐Byrne

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal watch · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychiatric care and mental health services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDementiaAdverse effectAntipsychoticPsychiatryIntensive care medicineNursing homesSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Internal medicineDiseaseNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antipsychotic medications are increasingly used to treat agitation in elderly patients with dementia, even though this use has been associated with increased risks for adverse events. These researchers used Ontario administrative health data to examine the risk for serious adverse events (SAEs) resulting in hospitalization or death within 30 days of initiating antipsychotic treatment in elderly patients with dementia. Patients were separated into study groups of community-dwelling patients and nursing-home residents. Patients …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal watchSame topicPsychiatric care and mental health servicesFrench-language works237,207