De l’écriture journalistique à l’écriture romanesque: la conquête de l’Algéri e chez Assia Djebar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude se concentre sur les intertextes coloniaux dans L’Amour, la fantasia d’Assia\nDjebar et, en particulier, sur les modalités de leur insertion. Elle montre que le roman de Djebar\nprivilégie le discours direct et le discours narrativisé pour commenter la représentation de la conquête\nd’Algérie dans la presse militaire du XIXe siècle. En plus de rappeler l’état de la presse à\nl’époque coloniale, cette étude fait un rapprochement entre les stratégies narratives adoptées dans\nl’écriture de L’Amour, la fantasia et celles exploitées par l’écriture journalistique. La polyphonie et\nl’intertextualité se révèlent salutaires non seulement dans la lutte contre la censure, mais aussi\ndans la lutte pour la liberté qu’il s’agisse de la liberté d’expression ou de l’émancipation politique\net sociale
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".