Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischemia and heart rate variability: results of a 48-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has analgesic properties and may be used to treat pain in patients with therapeutically refractory angina who are unsuitable for myocardial revascularization. Some studies have also demonstrated an anti-ischemic effect. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term persistence of the effects of SCS on myocardial ischemia and on heart rate variability. METHODS: Fifteen patients (9 males, 6 females, mean age 76 +/- 8 years, range 58-90 years) with severe refractory angina pectoris (Canadian class III-IV), on optimal pharmacological therapy, unsuitable for myocardial revascularization and treated with SCS for a mean follow-up of 39 +/- 27 months (range 9-92 months) were studied. Eleven patients had had a previous myocardial infarction and 5 a coronary artery bypass graft. The mean ejection fraction was 54 +/- 7% (range 36-65%). All patients underwent 48-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring and were randomly assigned to 24 hours without SCS (off period) and 24 hours with SCS (on period). The primary endpoints were: number of ischemic episodes, total duration of ischemic episodes (min), and total ischemic burden (mV*min). RESULTS: The heart rate was not statistically different during the off and on SCS periods (median 64 and 67 b/min respectively). The number of ischemic episodes decreased from a median of 6 (range 0-29) during the off period to 3 (range 0-24) during the on period (p < 0.05). The total duration of ischemic episodes decreased from a median of 29 min (range 0- 186 min) during the off period to 16 min (range 0-123 min) during the on period (p < 0.05). The total ischemic burden decreased from a median of 2.5 mV*min (range 0-19.5 mV*min) during the off period to 0.8 mV*min (range 0-13 mV*min) during the on period (p = NS). The heart rate variability parameters were similar during the on and off periods. CONCLUSIONS: SCS exerts long-term anti-ischemic effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".