Localized malignant pleural mesothelioma-A case report-
Bibliographic record
Abstract
胸膜肺全摘を施行せず，2年間無再発生存中の限局性悪性胸膜中皮腫の1例を経験したので報告する．本疾患は，病理学的にはびまん性悪性胸膜中皮腫と全く同じ所見を持つものの，生物学的悪性度が異なる稀な疾患である．症例は元建設業の70代男性．他疾患で受診した際，胸部レントゲンで左上肺野に約10 cm大の腫瘤を指摘．経皮的穿刺細胞診でclass V腺癌と診断された．胸壁合併左肺上葉切除を施行．病理学的に二相型悪性胸膜中皮腫と診断された．追加の治療は施行せず術後2年余経過したが，CTやPETで再発所見なく現在も生存中である．本疾患は術前から「限局性」と診断することが困難であり，術式選択が最大の問題となる．症例を集積し，診断方法を確立する必要がある．
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".