MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2713085277 · doi:10.23977/isspj.2016.11001

Road marking abrasion defects detection based on video image processing

2016· article· en· W2713085277 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInformation Systems and Signal Processing Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of Transportation
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftwareImage processingComputer visionAbrasion (mechanical)Artificial intelligenceProcess (computing)Video cameraImage (mathematics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pavement marking occupies an important position in the road traffic safety operation. A large number of domestic and foreign research and practice has proved that the effective use and maintenance of road signs and markings reduce traffic accidents and improve the capacity of great significance. The main content of this paper is the design of mobile video image acquisition device to road damage to the road traffic marking defect detection, video image to carry out research on road marking based on wear and breakage from video images. The process is random image acquisition of pavement markings, respectively the image pre-processing, image binarization, marking angle correction, marking extraction and detection. Finally, developing software on marking the wear and damage degree detection based on Matlab software then have an image processing experiments. The results show that the software can accurately detect the road wear and damage situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it