MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2713822252 · doi:10.1002/9781119296126.ch58

Control of Alpha Case on Investment Cast Ti 6Al‐4V Using An Industrial Shelling System

2016· other· en· W2713822252 on OpenAlex
Grant Morin, Guy Marin, M.C. Parr, L. Forget, Jean Carignan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTitanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
Canadian institutionsCegep de Trois-RivieresUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCastingMaterials scienceSlurryMoldInvestment castingCubic zirconiaIndentation hardnessTitaniumMetallurgyPrime (order theory)ViscosityTitanium alloyComposite materialMicrostructureAlloyCeramicMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molten titanium has a strong reaction with most of the refractories used for mold building in investment casting. Calcia partially stabilized zirconia (PSZ) used as a facecoat material has a reduced reaction with molten titanium and is still offered at an affordable cost. However poor process control can greatly impair the formation of a thin alpha case, an essential condition to limit the amount of subsequent chemical milling. The effect of the prime stuccos, the viscosity of the prime slurry, and the shell mold preheating temperature on alpha case thickness have been evaluated for different casting wall thicknesses. Alpha case depth have been determined by metallographic techniques and microhardness measurements on different casting cross sections. Mnimum achievable alpha case thickness has been determined with a calcia partially stabilized zirconia (PSZ) face coat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it