MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2714489159 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.064317

Unexpected distribution of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> strength in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>49</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2017· article· lv· W2714489159 on OpenAlexaff
H. L. Crawford, A. O. Macchiavelli, P. Fallon, M. Albers, V. M. Bader, D. Bazin, C. M. Campbell, R. M. Clark, M. Cromaz, J. Dilling, A. Gade, A. T. Gallant, J. D. Holt, R. V. F. Janssens, R. Krücken, C. Langer, T. Lauritsen, I. Y. Lee, J. Menéndez, S. Noji, S. Paschalis, F. Recchia, J. Rissanen, A. Schwenk, M. Scott, J. Simonis, S. R. Stroberg, J. A. Tostevin, C. Walz, D. Weißhaar, A. Wiens, K. Wimmer, S. Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2017
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMF
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungU.S. Department of EnergyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Nuclear Security AdministrationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceOffice of ScienceEuropean Research CouncilNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsNucleonAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The calcium isotopes have emerged as a critical testing ground for new microscopically derived shell-model interactions, and a great deal of experimental and theoretical focus has been directed toward this region. We investigate the relative spectroscopic strengths associated with $1{f}_{7/2}$ neutron hole states in $^{47,49}\mathrm{Ca}$ following one-neutron knockout reactions from $^{48,50}\mathrm{Ca}$. The observed reduction of strength populating the $7/{2}_{1}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ state in $^{49}\mathrm{Ca}$, as compared to $^{47}\mathrm{Ca}$, is inconsistent with shell-model calculations using both phenomenological interactions such as GXPF1, and interactions derived from microscopically based two- and three-nucleon forces. The result suggests a fragmentation of the $l=3$ strength to higher-lying states as suggested by the microscopic calculations, but the observed magnitude of the reduction is not reproduced in any shell-model description.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207