Sum Power Minimization for TDD-Enabled Full-Duplex Bi-Directional MIMO Systems Under Channel Uncertainty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we address a sum power minimization problem for a bi-directional and full-duplex (FD) communication system, where the required rate constraints are imposed on the guaranteed communication rates in each direction. In this regard, the impact of channel-state information (CSI) error, as well as the signal distortion due to hardware impairments are jointly taken into account. In order to ensure backwards compatibility to an equivalent half-duplex setup, we assume a time-division-duplex capable system where the FD communication process takes place in multiple independent time segments. Due to the intractable structure of the resulting optimization problem, a weighted minimum mean squared-error based method is applied to cast the power minimization problem into a separately convex structure, which can be iteratively solved with a guaranteed convergence. The resulting computational complexity of the algorithm is then discussed analytically. Finally, the performance of the proposed algorithm is numerically evaluated over different levels of rate demand, CSI error and transmitter/receiver dynamic range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it