MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2719290876 · doi:10.33997/j.afs.2006.19.3.009

Fish Assemblages in Abandoned Ponds and Waterways Surrounding Brackish Water Aquaculture Ponds in Panay Island, the Philippines

2007· article· en· W2719290876 on OpenAlexaff
Kou Ikejima, Jesse D. Ronquillo, Valeriano L. Corre, Virgilio A. Dureza

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Fisheries Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsMangroveHabitatFisheryBrackish waterAquacultureJuvenile fishEcologyBiomass (ecology)Vegetation (pathology)GeographyFish <Actinopterygii>BiologySalinity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fish assemblage structure in abandoned ponds and waterways in Panay Island, Philippine, were investigated and compared with those in mangrove fringed habitats. Juvenile and small resident fishes were collected using a seine net set along the beach, creeks, waterways and abandoned culture ponds. Sampling stations were characterized by the absence or presence of mangrove vegetation. Fish diversity was higher on beaches and in creeks with mangroves and in creeks without mangrove compared with abandoned ponds and waterways. Gobiidae was the most diverse species group, being abundant in most stations. More species of juveniles occurred in mangrove habitats and river banks than in abandoned ponds and waterways. However, fish abundance and biomass were not clearly different between stations. The results suggest that fish diversity decreases in areas with culture pond constructions, but these still provide habitat for gobies and juveniles of a few other species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Fisheries ScienceSame topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207