Von der Mehrsprachigkeit zur Mehrschriftigkeit. Elemente einer Theorie des sprachlichen Ausbaus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tandis que la linguistique étudie depuis longtemps de nombreux aspects liés au plurilinguisme, les recherches se rapportant aux pratiques de l'écrit par des personnes plurilingues occupent toujours une place marginale.On a longtemps négligé le fait que les personnes plurilingues ne communiquent pas seulement dans plusieurs langues à l'oral mais également à l'écrit, ce médium demandant d'autres ressources structurelles.À la lumière de deux études de cas sur les pratiques de l'écrit de personnes plurilingues au Canada et dans la République de Moldavie, nous exposons les relations existantes entre le plurilinguisme et la plurilittératie.De surcroit, nous souhaitons montrer le rôle joué par la plurilittératie dans la théorie de l'élaboration langagière et ce que signifie pour un individu plurilingue le fait d'écrire dans une ou plusieurs langues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".