MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2720592857 · doi:10.1002/iir.1229

Insolvency Law as a Main Pillar of Market Economy—A Critical Assessment of the Greek Insolvency Law

2015· article· en· W2720592857 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Christoph G. Paulus, Stathis Potamitis, Alexandros Rokas, Ignacio Tirado

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Insolvency Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Insolvency and Governance
Canadian institutionsLearning Partnership
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsolvencyRestructuringPillarLawEconomicsBusinessLaw and economicsPolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, we use the Greek insolvency law and its present status as a raw model for the demonstration of the central role insolvency law generally plays within a given economy. The Greek example amplifies in a particularly instructive way the interrelationship between the functionality of a legal restructuring and liquidation regime, on the one side, and the recovery of a state's overall economic affairs, on the other. We present our thoughts in a way that leads from general deliberations (A and B) to a description of the present Greek insolvency law (C) and finally its critical assessment (D), before we conclude (E). Thereby, we hope to make sufficiently clear that this type of approach to insolvency law is educative for many more jurisdictions than just the example that we have chosen. Copyright © 2015 INSOL International and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.023
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Insolvency ReviewSame topicCorporate Insolvency and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207