Stanley Park Barrow's goldeneye and surf scoter survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Report submitted to: Dany Catt, FWR Instructor and Dr. Sean Boyd, Research Scientist, Canadian Wildlife Service, Delta, B.C. Submitted by: Colin Bailey & Stacey Carter. This survey is the sixth in a series of year long projects carried out by the Fish, Wildlife and Recreation students at the British Columbia Institute of Technology (B.C.I.T.), in cooperation with the Canadian Wildlife Service (C.W.S.) (Rotinsky, 1999) (Marshal et. al., 2003). The study had three main objectives for the period of October 2004 to April 2005: Determine the relative abundance and distribution of the Barrow's Goldeneye, Surf Scoters, and all other seabirds along the foreshore of Stanley Park. Collect sex, age, and pairing data on the Barrow's Goldeneye and Surf Scoters along the foreshore of Stanley Park. Collect Global Positioning (G.P.S) data, defining all of the survey zones within the study area around the Stanley Park seawall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".