MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2721810300 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r206-10

Real Time Flow Prediction using Fuzzy Logic Models

2000· article· en· W2721810300 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Debebe Aschalew, Willy Bauwens

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy logicComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Models to predict flows in different parts of an urban catchment are developed using so-called Fuzzy Logic in combination with artificial neural networks.These models are developed to be used as part of a real time control system so that flows at various horizons can be computed and used as inputs to the controller.These models showed excellent performance both in their accuracy and execution time and proved to be very helpful in supplying the necessary forecasts for the real time controller.Another advantage of such models is that they can be developed in a relatively short time. 0.IntroductionReal-time control in hydrologic systems involves mainly the operation of a reservoir system by making decisions on reservoir releases as information become available, with relatively short time interval, which may vary between several minutes to several hours.In order to have sufficient time to set the control points, there is a need for determining the appropriate control action ahead of time.That in most cases requires forecasts of rainfall or flow at different critical sections in the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207