BBI608-201GBM: A phase Ib/II clinical study of napabucasin (BBI608) in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) for adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e13525 Background: Napabucasin, a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in clinical development, suppresses cancer stemness by targeting STAT3-driven gene transcription. Pre-clinically, potent and broad-spectrum anti-cancer activity was observed in vitro and in vivo, alone and in combination with other agents. PK studies demonstrated napabucasin penetration in the murine orthotopic GBM model. Methods: A phase Ib/II open-label, multi-center study in pts with GBM at first recurrence who have not received bevacizumab, was performed to determine safety and preliminary activity of napabucasin administered orally at 480mg BID po in combination with TMZ 150mg/m²/day po; days 1 through 5 of each 28 day cycle, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A 6-patient safety cohort was planned to evaluate the occurrence of DLT during the first 28 days of combination treatment with napabucasin and TMZ. 4 additional patients have been enrolled under the RP2D expansion phase. Results: 11 pts have been enrolled to date; no DLT was observed in the safety cohort and the RP2D of the combination is 480 mg BID for napabucasin. The safety profile was consistent with that of each agent as monotherapy and most common AEs included grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, abdominal cramps, and vomiting. Two patients requested to withdraw treatment due to concurrent conditions and AE s. 9 patients were evaluable by RANO; Disease Control Rate was observed in 5 patients (55.5%) of which 4 achieved PR (44.4%) and 1 achieved SD (11.1%). The Overall response rate was 44.4% in the evaluable patients. Conclusions: This phase Ib/II study demonstrated that napabucasin at 480 mg BID can be safely combined with temozolomide at full dose and showed encouraging anti-tumor activity in patients with recurrent Glioblastoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02315534. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".