MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2723774362

nAble Adaptive Scaffolding Agent - Intelligent Support for Novices.

2008· article· en· W2723774362 on OpenAlex
W. Joseph MacInnes, Stephanie Santosa, Nathan Kronenfeld, Judi McCuaig, William Wright

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWeb Intelligence/IAT Workshops · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSandbox (software development)ScaffoldHuman–computer interactionTask (project management)MultimediaArtificial intelligenceSoftware engineeringProgramming languageEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scaffolding techniques allow human instructors to support novice learners in critical early stages, and to remove that support as expertise grows. This paper describes nAble, an adaptive scaffolding agent designed to guide new users through the use of an analytic software tool in the ‘nSpace Sandbox’ for visual sense-making. nAble adapts the interface and instructional content based on user expertise, learning style and subtask. Bayesian Networks and Hidden Markov task models provide the agent reasoning engine. An experiment was conducted in which participants were provided with one of: an adaptive scaffold, an indexed help file or a human guide. Users of the adaptive scaffold outperformed users of the indexed help and more quickly converged with the performance of users with the human guide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it