MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W27240548

Spectrum Policy in Canada: A CWIRP Background Paper

2007· article· en· W27240548 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Graham Longford, Matthew Wong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommon value auctionSpectrum auctionSpectrum (functional analysis)Spectrum managementBroadbandFocus (optics)Broad spectrumBusinessEconomicsPolitical sciencePublic economicsTelecommunicationsComputer scienceMicroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this background paper we will first briefly describe the spectrum and its operation, followed by how the spectrum is used. We will then provide an introduction to spectrum policy, including how policy is specifically handled in Canada. This will focus on the current trend towards spectrum auctions which we feel is unfairly biased towards incumbent providers. Finally, we will conclude this backgrounder by discussing the future of spectrum management and policy in Canada, in particular, the implications of auctions and “market forces”-oriented policy for community, municipal, and rural broadband.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.014
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicICT Impact and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207