MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2724127970 · doi:10.4050/f-0073-2017-12031

Model Based Engineering for Advanced Integrated Modular Avionics - Focus and Challenges

2017· article· en· W2724127970 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Gaska, Doug Summerville, MARILYN T. GASKA

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAvionicsIntegrated modular avionicsModular designFocus (optics)Systems engineeringComputer scienceSoftware engineeringEngineeringComputer architectureAerospace engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced Integrated Modular Avionics (A-IMA) will drive new focus and challenges for Model Based Engineering (MBE). First, there is the need to bridge MBE to legacy system elements that were developed without MBE along with the need to handle hybrid Open System Architecture / Integrated Modular Avionics (OSA/IMA) based architectures. Second, there is the need for MBE to be reusable and interoperable across product development cycles as technology insertions occur. Third, there is the need for integration of MBE into synthesizable descriptions that can also be effectively validated for mixed general purpose, safety, and secure computing and networking environments. Fourth is the need for effective application of MBE in hybrid waterfall and agile development environments where target infrastructure is scalable in capability and cost. Fifth is the need for MBE to support partitioned roles across companies, government, and universities where one entity does requirements, one does architecture, one develops components, one provides formal test, and another provides system sustainment. There are a number of industry and university efforts underway to address these focus items and challenges spread across these adjacent MBE complex system domains. This paper is focused on the current state of each of these areas relative to use in A-IMA systems based on industry initiatives and academic research. It uses the driverless car for comparison as an emerging "Advanced Integrated Modular Architecture" and identifies its parallel approaches to address these focused items and challenges. This work is being built on the authors' work exploring dual use technologies being developed for the driverless car domain that will lead to a market of 10 Million autonomous cars operating in 2020. Previous papers have addressed identification of potential advanced automotive dual use transformational hardware and software technologies including many core processing, advanced software autonomy and data fusion components, unified mixed criticality networking, and integrated cyber security for A-IMA. A testbed has also been recently proposed as a mechanism to evaluate these dual use technologies in an A-IMA context. This paper extends the dual use view to include understanding of the best-of-breed avionics MBE environment and how it can be complementary to leveraging a testbed environment in addressing affordable, scalable, and open solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207