MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2724443291

Mining-logistics in the Arctic Circle

2014· article· en· W2724443291 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Industrial Minerals

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticThe arcticGeographyOceanographyMainlandSea iceArctic ice packPhysical geographyIce capsClimatologyMeteorologyGeologyArchaeologyGlacier
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent report by Norway's classification society DNV and the Fridtjof Nansen Institute noted, The Arctic can also be considered as referring to all the northerly places where average July temperatures do not rise above 10 degrees Celsius. By this definition, much of the Bering Sea between Russia and Alaska, and the Labrador Sea between mainland Canada and Greenland, could be considered Arctic even though they lie south of the Arctic Circle. Nordic Orion is an ice-class 1A ship, says Bonfils. These ships are designed and built to operate in the harsh conditions of the Arctic. [Koji Sekimizu] spent five days onboard the nuclear-powered icebreaker 50 Let Pobedy in the Northern Sea Passage in mid-2013, to gain a personal understanding of the issues faced by Arctic mariners and their vessels. He pointed out that, If the elements of national regulation from Canada are to be maintained there will be a number of different points to be considered. As far as I can see, in the forthcoming five years, the Northern Sea Route will be the main shipping lane for navigation and passage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0110.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207