A Microscopic Study of Platy and Concretionary Structures in Certain Saskatchewan Soils1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thin sections of platy A2 horizons of several Saskatchewan soils which have developed under podzolization or solonization processes were studied A synthetic resin was used to impregnate and fix the soil aggregates so that slides for microscopic study could be made. The thin section studies revealed “banded fabric” in the platy horizons of podzolized soils The platy A2 horizon of a solonetzic soil revealed an “isoband fabric” as did the A2 of a podzolic-solonetzic soil studied. “Wrinkle marks” and “invasion amygdali” (concretions) were also noted in samples from A2 horizons of podzolized soils. A brief discussion of possible modes of formation of these micro-structures as proposed by several authors is included. It is suggested that the thin section technique might well be applied in studying pore space and channel arrangement in soils, as well as aggregates of all types It would also probably be useful in studying such matters as the distribution of organic matter within the soil body. This technique migh...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".