MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2725057776 · doi:10.1002/9781119288091.ch2

An Index to the Body of Knowledge of Simulation Systems Engineering

2017· other· en· W2725057776 on OpenAlexaff
Umut Durak, Tuncer Ören, Andreas Tolk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOntologyIndex (typography)Computer scienceOntology engineeringRepresentation (politics)EntertainmentProcess (computing)Knowledge representation and reasoningData scienceInformation retrievalProcess ontologyWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligenceEpistemologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter particularly focuses on the simulation systems engineering body of Knowledge (SSE BoK). It first presents the foundations and applications of SSE, and reveals an initial proposal for the knowledge areas of SSE. The SSE BoK is in this sense a part of the modeling and simulation (M&S) BoK. Tuncer Oren introduced his recommendations for developing an index for the M&S BoK. The M&S BoK Index has then been developed following these recommendations. A recent publication of Oren documents the richness of simulation and catalogs almost 400 types of simulation. Its application areas can be categorized into experimentation, gaining experience and entertainment. Later, the chapter discusses an ontology development effort for SSE. Following Oren's ideas for utilizing ontologies in BoK studies in order to provide an ontology-based dictionary for the terms to show also their logical relationships, the chapter presents an ontological representation of the discussed Process area under the Engineering topic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207