MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Civic Pageantry Including Royal Entries

2017· other· en· W2725170387 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Lancashire

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in Britain · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcessionWorshipPoliticsIdentity (music)Government (linguistics)LawHistoryPublic administrationPolitical scienceArtAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Civic pageantry involves ceremonial activities of public display which are sponsored or performed by the governing authorities of a city or town. Civic pageantry is social and political: confirming governing authority and fostering a public civic identity and harmonious civic relationships. (Religious pageantry with the primary purpose of religious worship/celebration, even when involving the civic government, is excluded from this description.) Civic pageantry consists, in medieval and early Tudor England, largely of formal street processions, which may or may not include pageants: displays involving costumed performers and/or constructed exhibits, either carried through the streets or located on stages positioned along the processional route. The three major forms of social/political civic pageantry, to 1541, were the royal entry, the marching Midsummer Watch, and the mayoral inauguration procession. Other forms also existed. Royal entries were especially prevalent in wealthy London, because of its geographical proximity to the court at Westminster, and London's Midsummer Watch and mayoral inauguration were also especially elaborate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1460.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Medieval Literature in BritainSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207