MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W272534760

Clinical Comparative Bioavailability Study of ICN- and Roche-Manufactured 30 mg Pyridostigmine Bromide Tablets in Healthy Volunteers

2001· article· en· W272534760 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ronald Goldwater, Michael J. Garvin, Sandra Braun

Bibliographic record

VenueDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioequivalenceConfidence intervalBioavailabilityCmaxPyridostigmine BromidePharmacokineticsMedicinePyridostigmineChromatographyPharmacologyChemistryInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pyridostigmine Bromide 30 mg tablets manufactured by ICN Canada and Roche UK were studied in a two treatment, crossoverdesign bloavailability study. Plasma samples obtained from the 30 healthy subjects that completed the study were analyzed using a validated LC/MS/MS method and concentrations were used to determine bioequivalence. The products were found to be bioequivalen based upon the 90% confidence intervals of the logarithmically transformed AUC 0-T, AUC 0-Infinity and CMAX. The confidence intervals surrounding the ratios of test versus reference means were within the 0.80 to 1.25 bioequivalence limits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Same topicPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207