MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2725615758

Influenza Induces Platelet-endothelial Adhesion: Implications for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome after Influenza Virus Infection

2014· dissertation· en· W2725615758 on OpenAlexaff
Asela Gamage

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcute respiratory distressMedicineImmunologyPlateletVirologyVirusInfluenza A virusMicrobiologyBiologyInternal medicineLung
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Loss of barrier integrity of the lung microvascular endothelium is a prerequisite for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Severe influenza is complicated by ARDS, and treatment with antiviral therapy is only partially effective at reducing mortality. Recent studies have pinpointed platelets involvement in ARDS pathogenesis. Our lab has recently reported that human influenza can infect lung endothelial cells in vitro, but the functional consequence of such infection is incompletely understood. We therefore studied whether influenza infection of lung endothelium can lead to enhanced platelet adhesion and if so, by what mechanism. We observed an increase in endothelial-platelet interaction after influenza infection of the endothelium in vitro. The increased interaction was due to upregulation of fibronectin that enabled endothelial-platelet adhesion via platelet integrin alpha-5 beta-1. Inhibition of platelets using acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) improved hypoxemia and survival of mice infected with influenza, further implicating platelets in the pathogenesis of severe influenza..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→