MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2725829897 · doi:10.1093/geroni/igx004.2329

END-OF-LIFE PAIN FOR NURSING HOME RESIDENTS: THE ROLE OF HEALTHCARE AIDES AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS

2017· article· en· W2725829897 on OpenAlexaffabout
Malcolm Doupe, Genevieve Thompson, C. Reid, Jennifer Baumbusch, Jennifer Knopp‐Sihota

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovation in Aging · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsAthabasca UniversityUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyMinimum Data SetFeelingNursingHealth careEmpowermentQuality of life (healthcare)MedicineNursing homesPresentation (obstetrics)Psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pain management is a hallmark of quality end-of-life care. This presentation will define pain trajectories in nursing home (NH) residents’ last six months of life, and show how these trajectories are influenced by health care aides (HCAs) and their working environment. This observational study utilizes the RAI-Minimum Data Set (MDS) linked to the TREC Measurement System (TMS) survey. MDS provides resident-level longitudinal data on pain plus various clinical measures. TMS captures point-in-time metrics on HCA supply, their characteristics (e.g., time rushed, feelings of empowerment) and their working environment (e.g., team leadership, care culture). Data are available on a representative sample of NHs from Western Canada. Data were analyzed on 982 residents in their last six months of life. Pain levels were negligible for 60.6% of residents during this time, and increased substantially or remained high for 34.4%. The effect of HCAs and contextual factors on these pain trajectories is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovation in AgingSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207