MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2725832670 · doi:10.20286/jeas.v1i1.4

Gross Value Added per Person Analyses of Transportation Companies of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in 2005 - 2011

2016· article· en· W2725832670 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lembo Tanning, Toivo Tanning

Bibliographic record

VenueNova Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMethodology and Impact of Social Science Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGross value addedRecessionEuropean unionProductivityFinancial crisisValue (mathematics)Eu countriesBusiness cycleEconomic policyBusinessEconomic recoveryEconomicsEconomyEconomic growthMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim is to analyze the labor productivity of transportation and storage companies of Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) in 2005 - 2011, with emphasis labor productivity by gross value added per person employed and employee. The objective is to analyse labor in the Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania countries and continue with the new European Union (EU) Member States from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE-8) or new EU countries before and after the economic crisis, and to compare them on the EU level. We will look at how the economic crisis has affected the labor productivity of transportation companies. What are the lessons learned from the economic crisis? The literature review shows in short the crisis theory. It is concerned with explaining the recession, depression and business cycle in economics. We will make a short view of the financial crisis. Based on this and previous publications, we will offer a number of generalized suggestions.  Keywords: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, transportation companies, labour productivity, gross value added, economic crisis. Abstract The aim is to analyze the labor productivity of transportation and storage companies of Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) in 2005 - 2011, with emphasis labor productivity by gross value added per person employed and employee. The objective is to analyse labor in the Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania countries and continue with the new European Union (EU) Member States from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE-8) or new EU countries before and after the economic crisis, and to compare them on the EU level. We will look at how the economic crisis has affected the labor productivity of transportation companies. What are the lessons learned from the economic crisis? The literature review shows in short the crisis theory. It is concerned with explaining the recession, depression and business cycle in economics. We will make a short view of the financial crisis. Based on this and previous publications, we will offer a number of generalized suggestions.  Keywords: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, transportation companies, labour productivity, gross value added, economic crisis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.185
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNova Journal of Engineering and Applied SciencesSame topicMethodology and Impact of Social Science ResearchFrench-language works237,207