Droplet impact onto a solid sphere: Effect of wettability and impact velocity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collision of a droplet onto a still spherical particle was experimentally investigated. The effect of droplet impact velocity and wettability of the particle surface on collision outcomes was studied (0.05 < V0 < 5.0 and θ = 70°, 90°, 118°). Compared to the literature, the range of Weber number variations was significantly extended (0.1 < We < 1146), and while focus of the previous works was on impacts in which particle is larger than the droplet (Dr < 1), the drop to particle diameter ratio in this work was larger than one. Therefore, formation of a thin liquid film, i.e., lamella, was observed due to impact of a relatively high velocity droplet onto a hydrophobic particle. Temporal variations of various geometrical parameters of collision outcomes including lamella length and lamella base diameter were investigated during the impact. It was also shown that for hydrophobic targets, the extent of hydrophobicity of the particle does not affect the lamella geometry. A comprehensive map of all the available works in drop impact on a spherical target was also provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it