<b>Modulação do trofoblasto bovino na gestação de embriões clonados</b>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Certificamos que o Projeto intitulado "Modulação do trofoblasto bovino na gestação de embriões clonados", protocolado sob o CEUA nº 9408110315, sob a responsabilidade de Prof Dr Flavio Vieira Meirelles e equipe; Rodrigo da Silva Nunes Barreto -que envolve a produção, manutenção e/ou utilização de animais pertencentes ao filo Chordata, subfilo Vertebrata (exceto o homem), para fins de pesquisa científica (ou ensino) -encontra-se de acordo com os preceitos da Lei 11.794, de 8 de outubro de 2008, com o Decreto 6.899, de 15 de julho de 2009, com as normas editadas pelo Conselho Nacional de Controle da Experimentação Animal (CONCEA), e foi aprovado pela Comissão de Ética no Uso de Animais da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo (CEUA/FMZV) em reunião de 01/07/2015.We certify that the proposal "Modulation of bovine trophoblast in cloned pregnancy", utilizing 22 Bovines (22 females), protocol number CEUA 9408110315, under the responsibility of Prof Dr Flavio Vieira Meirelles and team; Rodrigo da Silva Nunes Barreto -which involves the production, maintenance and/or use of animals belonging to the phylum Chordata, subphylum Vertebrata (except human beings), for scientific research purposes (or teaching) -it's in accordance with Law 11.794, of October 8 2008, Decree 6899, of July 15, 2009, with the rules issued by the National Council for Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA), and was approved by the Ethic Committee on Animal Use of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science of São Paulo University (CEUA/FMZV) in the meeting of 07/01/2015.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".