MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2726290370 · doi:10.15173/m.v1i27.955

911: What's Your Emergency?

2016· article· en· W2726290370 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Hannah Roche

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Meducator · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulation healthPeer reviewMedicineEnvironmental healthPopulationPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emergency medicine is a central branch of medicine focusing on the immediate decisions and action necessary to prevent death or disability. I have had the opportunity to observe the inner workings of the emergency medical systems both locally here in Hamilton, and globally. The stark contrast in emergency healthcare between developed and developing nations raises distinct observations regarding measures that need to be taken to address the dire need of certain situations. While in Canada we wait mere hours in sanitary emergency rooms, millions – even billions – of people around the globe may wait days, months or beyond to be seen or treated. This inevitably leads to a drastically increased, and regrettably avoidable, mortality rate. Yet the issue is not typically an isolated one. Issues of greater importance like this, in the context of a developing nation, are often rooted and symptomatic of ongoing struggles of poverty, corruption, and violence. This perspective aims to compare and contrast emergency medical systems across global platforms in an effort to bring to light the immediate need for drastic intervention. Moreover, this intervention must stem from within a national infrastructure, resulting in a concerted effort to target this devastating cycle of poverty, disease, and death.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0070.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Meducator→Same topicDisaster Response and Management→French-language works237,207→