Eustochomorpha Girault, Neotriadomerus gen. n., and Proarescon gen. n. (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), early extant lineages in evolution of the family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
EustochomorphaGirault, with one described species,E. haeckeliGirault, from Australia is redescribed.NeotriadomerusHuber,gen. n., is described, together with seven new species, all from Australia:N. burwelliHuber,sp. n.,N. crassusHuber,sp. n.,N. darlingiHuber,sp. n.,N. gloriosusHuber,sp. n.,N. longiovipositorHuber,sp. n.,N. longissimusHuber,sp. n.(one of the largest species of Mymaridae), andN. poweraeHuber,sp. n.ProaresconHuber,gen. n., is described forP. primitivum(Huber),comb. n., transferred fromBorneomymarHuber, andP. similisHuber,sp. n., from Thailand. The previously unknown male ofBorneomymar madagascarHuber is described and the genus is redescribed from critical point dried and slide mounted specimens. Triadomerini,stat. n., is proposed to include six genera:Borneomymar,EustochomorphaandNeotriadomerus, and the CretaceousCarpenterianaYoshimoto,MacalpiniaYoshimoto andTriadomerusYoshimoto. Aresconini is proposed to include five (possibly six) genera:AresconEnock,KikikiHuber and Beardsley,ProaresconHuber andTinkerbellaHuber and Noyes, and the CretaceousMyanmymarHuber and, tentatively, alsoEnneagmusYoshimoto. The two tribes are proposed as being the earliest lineages in Mymaridae, withNeotriadomerusandTriadomerusbeing sister genera to the remaining extant and extinct genera, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".