Politique indienne et liberté religieuse au Canada, 1870-1950 : l'exemple des cimetières de bande
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis le 18e siècle, les autorités politiques canadiennes ont privilégié une approche de tolérance envers la diversité culturelle et religieuse, bien qu’à première vue, la politique indienne, et plus particulièrement les dispositions de la Loi sur les Indiens qui rendaient illégales certaines pratiques culturelles et religieuses, semblait s’inscrire en faux par rapport à cette orientation. Or, une analyse de l’attitude des fonctionnaires des Affaires indiennes en lien avec la gestion des cimetières de bande, entre 1870 et 1950, tend à confirmer que le contrôle des dépenses liées à la mise en application de la politique indienne et le souci d’assurer le succès des efforts de colonisation intérieure primaient sur la volonté d’acculturer et d’émanciper les Indiens, et de brimer par conséquent leur liberté religieuse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".