MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2726777804

Using all the Pieces to Solve the Puzzle: the Importance of Aboriginal Language Assessment in Child Populations

2013· article· en· W2726777804 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCarleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinguisticsComputer sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada’s Aboriginal children lag behind national age-level norms in reading and writing. They also leave school earlier and in higher percentages than non-Aboriginal peers. At the same time, a growing body of evidence, both anecdotal and census-based, suggests that all of Canada’s Aboriginal languages have declining numbers of fluent speakers and less than optimal intergenerational transmission. In this paper it is proposed that school success and language maintenance issues intertwine in a number of respects and that neither problem can be adequately addressed unless communities engage in the systematic evaluation of both Aboriginal and majority language knowledge. Problems that arise in testing child speakers of a polysynthetic language in a context of language attrition are briefly addressed. Key results obtained through the dual language testing of children in three Innu-speaking communities, one in Québec and two in Labrador, are presented. The discussion focuses on how these results are currently being used to inform community members about the state of language attrition and to optimize educational intervention strategies in both Innu and the local majority language. 
\n----- 
\nLes enfants autochtones du Canada sont à la traîne des normes d’âge nationales en lecture et en écriture. Ils quittent d’ailleurs l’école plus tôt et en pourcentage plus élevé que leurs pairs non autochtones. En même temps, un ensemble d’indices, à la fois anecdotiques et fondés sur les recensements, suggère que toutes les langues autochtones du Canada subissent une diminution du nombre de locuteurs qui parlent la langue couramment et souffrent d’une transmission intergénérationnelle appauvrie. Dans cet article, on propose que la réussite scolaire et les questions du maintien de langue sont entremêlées et qu’aucun des deux problèmes ne peut être abordé de manière adéquate à moins que les communautés ne participent à l’évaluation systématique des savoirs en langues autochtones et en langues majoritaires. On aborde brièvement des problèmes qui se posent dans l’évaluation des enfants qui sont locuteurs d’une langue polysynthétique dans un contexte d’attrition de langue. On présente ensuite des résultats-clés qui ont été obtenus par des essais chez les enfants dans trois communautés innues dont une au Québec et deux au Labrador. La discussion porte sur la manière dont ces résultats sont utilisés pour sensibiliser les membres de la communauté sur l’état d’attrition de la langue et pour optimiser les stratégies d’intervention éducationnelle en innu ainsi qu’en langue majoritaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it