Ruyer, la pensée de l’espace et la métaphore fondatrice de la connaissance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Suite à la présentation du défi pour l’épistémologie de sortir du dilemme entre rationalisme et empirisme, on demande si les notions mises en place par Ruyer sont articulables aux épistémologies du tiers. On montre la présence chez Ruyer à la fois des conséquences du retournement de la compréhension de l’espace capable d’être déclaré psychisme, et du refus de situer dans l’immanence pure le schème de résolution eupraxique des agrégations réussies que sont les formes vivantes. On tente ensuite de faire transparaître les lignes de force des épistémologies de Gaston Bachelard, de Michel Serres, puis dans une moindre mesure de Bergson et de Deleuze, de façon à montrer le refus de la part de Ruyer d’une limitation de la philosophie à ce que peut dire la science, en même temps que l’on tente de situer le verticalisme de sa position finale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".