MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2726863806

Large eddy simulation of boundary layers with embedded spanwise vortices

2009· article· en· W2726863806 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVortexBoundary layerWakeMechanicsPhysicsEddyTurbulenceBoundary layer controlPressure gradientBoundary layer thicknessClassical mechanics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we performed large eddy simulations of a zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer interacting with a periodic array of strong, spanwise-oriented vortices, generated at the edge of the boundary layer by a direct-forcing method. As the vortices advect downstream, they introduce strong perturbations that extend to the near-wall region, and alter significantly the turbulence dynamics by lifting and deforming the near-wall eddies. This interaction increases the wall shear stress. The spanwise vortices lose their coherence and strength within 20 boundary layer thicknesses of their introduction, at which point the boundary layer begins its reversion to its undisturbed state. The near-wall region returns to equilibrium first, while the outer region recovers very slowly (particularly the wake region, where turbulent production, diffusion and dissipation are weaker).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it